Artigo publicado na Revista Trágica: Estudos sobre Nietzsche
Para ter acesso, clique no link abaixo.
Resumo: O artigo acompanha a contraposição, realizada por Deleuze, entre a crítica genealógica de Nietzsche e a crítica kantiana da razão pela própria razão. São privilegiados os argumentos de Nietzsche contra o imperativo categórico e sua análise da vontade de verdade, tomando como fio condutor a tipologia moral tal como é dissecada por Deleuze, ressaltando que, para Nietzsche, é necessário determinar que relação de forças se exprime na vontade que almeja o verdadeiro ou o Bem universal. A crítica kantiana teria sido incapaz de ultrapassar as forças reativas que se exprimem na razão, na moral e na religião. Trata-se, assim, de perguntar o que seria um pensamento não submetido às forças reativas e que pudesse afirmar a vida, estar a serviço da vida afirmativa, na medida em que o pensamento está sempre implicado nas relações de força que lhe dão origem.
Palavras-chave: crítica genealógica, vontade de potência, tipologia, imagem do pensamento.
Genealogical critique in the verge of the philosophy of difference
Abstract: The article traces the contraposition held by Deleuze, from the genealogical critique of Nietzsche and the Kantian critique of reason by reason itself. They are privileged Nietzsche’s arguments against the categorical imperative and his analysis of will to truth, having as a guiding moral typology as it is dissected by Deleuze, noting that, for Nietzsche, it is necessary to determine wich relationship of forces is expressed in the will that seeks the true or universal good. Kant's critique would have been unable to overcome the reactive forces which are expressed on reason, morality, and religion. It is, therefore, to ask what would be a thought that is not subject to reactive forces and could affirm life, being at service of affirmative life, to the extent that thought is always implicated in power relations that give rise to it.
Abstract: The article traces the contraposition held by Deleuze, from the genealogical critique of Nietzsche and the Kantian critique of reason by reason itself. They are privileged Nietzsche’s arguments against the categorical imperative and his analysis of will to truth, having as a guiding moral typology as it is dissected by Deleuze, noting that, for Nietzsche, it is necessary to determine wich relationship of forces is expressed in the will that seeks the true or universal good. Kant's critique would have been unable to overcome the reactive forces which are expressed on reason, morality, and religion. It is, therefore, to ask what would be a thought that is not subject to reactive forces and could affirm life, being at service of affirmative life, to the extent that thought is always implicated in power relations that give rise to it.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário